Compensation may take the form of cash payments or repairs or replacements, depending on the terms of the compensation contract. For example, with respect to household insurance, the owner pays insurance premiums to the insurance company in return for the assurance that the homeowner will be compensated if the home suffers damage from fires, natural disasters or other hazards specified in the insurance contract. In the unfortunate event that the house is severely damaged, the insurance company is required to restore the property to its original condition – either by repairs by licensed contractors or by reimbursement to the owner for expenses for such repairs. As with any other form of insurance, liability insurance covers compensation costs, including court costs, fees and accounts. The amount of insurance depends on the specific agreement and the cost of insurance depends on many factors, including the history of claims. In 1825, Haiti was forced to pay France what was then called the ”debt of independence.” The payments were used to cover losses suffered by French plantation owners after the loss of land and slaves. While this type of compensation has been incredibly unfair, it is an example of many historical cases that show how compensation has been applied without compensation worldwide. Coverage for consecutive damages may include compensation for current liabilities, such as fixed wages and operating costs. Insurance companies are looking for rights that indicate excessive expectations. For example, a bakery that has been temporarily closed to repairs following a fire could be eligible for a reasonable turnover refund, but not for losses significantly higher than usual. Although compensation agreements have not always had a name, they are not a new approach.
Historically, compensation agreements have helped to ensure cooperation between individuals, businesses and governments. Indirect losses resulting from physical and harmful damage to normal activity can be considered as consequential damage. In the event of a breach of contract, the remedy recognized for an owner is the recovery of damages resulting directly from the breach (also known as ”compensatory damages”), such as costs. B repair or completion of work in accordance with contractual documents, loss of value of lost or damaged work.  In addition to compensatory damages, an owner may also claim consecutive damages (sometimes referred to as ”indirect damages” or ”special damages”), collect product losses and lost revenue or turnover, and may be recovered if it is determined that such damages were reasonably foreseeable at the time of the drafting of the contract or were ”in the context of the parties` observation”.  This is a factual provision that could lead to liability of the contractor for a huge loss. For example, the cost of completing without notice may decrease relative to the operating revenue losses that an owner could claim due to a closing period. To require consecutive damages, a party who has suffered personal injury, property or financial damage must meet an obligation to reduce damage, which means that it is required to reduce or minimize the effects and losses resulting from the injury.  Consecutive damage is indirect damage caused by damage to commercial property or equipment. A business owner can purchase insurance to cover property and property damage and can also obtain coverage for secondary damage. A non-success clause or clause compensates the owner of these losses of income.
The origin of the legal theory, which is the basis of ”consecutive damages”, is widely attributed to the English case Hadley v. of the 19th century. Baxendale, in which a miller ordered the purchase of a vilebrequin for a steam engine in the mill. The party that agreed to produce the part (which was essential for the operation and/or